Yes, it was I who proposed that analysis already in La responsabilité de l'écrivain. I theorize it a little more in that book, where I show that the relationship between the author and the work is not limited to the «author-function» described by Foucault, according to Whatsapp Mobile Number List which the name of the author unifies a series of works and constitutes them as “a single work”, which is what gives you property rights over it. The supposed resemblance between the author and the work is the object of a deep belief, from which the link between the moral of the author and the moral of the work is derived.
I examine this resemblance through the relationship between the Whatsapp Mobile Number List author and his characters, from intimate writing, where that relationship is transparent (the "I" of the intimate diary or autobiography is that of the author), to Whatsapp Mobile Number List far removed from the author's life, but which can hide a resemblance not visible at first sight. view, which opens an interpretive space (Flaubert would have said "Madame Bovary is me"). In the same way, it is assumed that the author is the cause of the work because it derives from a creative project, from an intention.
This causal link is the source of the author's criminal responsibility. However, in my book I show the limits of the identification between the author and the work according to these three dimensions. In the first place, the perimeter of the work can be Whatsapp Mobile Number List unstable, as well as its unity, for stylistic or thematic reasons that lead to its periodization, as in the case of Pablo Picasso (pink period, blue period, cubist period...) or by Martin Heidegger (before or after the turn), or their division, as in the case of Céline's pamphlets, which were separated from his novels (it was he who did not want to reissue them).