Further analysis of these competitors (e.g. the SEMrush research I did for Wrike) would influence strategy going forward. Comparable and competing pages As for the compare pages, I've already determined that Twproject doesn't have any linkable items to compare. So instead, I can research which pages have historically been successful in their niche. If Twproject were to invest in creating content with a strong search opportunity, it would be the Competing Pages. Simply analyzing what is categorized for “team management”
will provide direction. Result number four is a MindTools blog post that covers team management skills: This is a great content idea for Twproject. Additionally, Majestic reports that this article only has 20 referring domains. It is reasonable to expect that Twproject could create content that ranks competitively for that search term if the content was high quality jewelry retouching service and promoted (for links) appropriately. As I work to secure links for Twproject, I will need to constantly evaluate competitors and comparable content to keep my strategy fresh. put it all together My preliminary research on
Twproject revealed information that will guide the development of their project strategy. Here are a few things to remember: There are research opportunities for Twproject to make modest short-term gains. Twproject has a shortage of linkable assets. Asset building is necessary to sustain a long-term campaign, with long-term results. Current research results and competitor strategies should guide asset creation. There are relevant (but limited) linking opportunities for Twproject to secure links to service pages and the homepage.